From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 20:44:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A686416A4CF for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from coruscant.rfc1149.org (coruscant.rfc1149.org [217.160.130.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD9743D31 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:44:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne@rfc2549.org) Received: by coruscant.rfc1149.org (Postfix, from userid 110) id C665B3CE9; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kamino.rfc1149.org (kamino.rfc1149.org [2001:8d8:81:11::2]) by coruscant.rfc1149.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DF53CDE for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:44:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by kamino.rfc1149.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 748E926; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:44:50 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> (ttz@cobbled.net's message of "Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:09 +0100") References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86EBB@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <40E59559.8090907@cronyx.ru> <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> From: Arne Schwabe Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:44:50 +0200 Message-ID: <867jtj4i4d.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on coruscant.rfc1149.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 20:44:55 -0000 n0g0013 writes: >> Yup. PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't >> ever get stolen or compromised. That makes it much harder for >> someone to successfully impersonate you. > > what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i > investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant > to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). > > does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt > won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently > won't verify the content). gnus does it the same way as mutt (Emacs Mail Client). Arne -- compiling millions of tiny c-programs...done checking for a working configure script... not found