Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:44:50 +0200 From: Arne Schwabe <arne@rfc2549.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow Message-ID: <867jtj4i4d.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> In-Reply-To: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> (ttz@cobbled.net's message of "Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:09 %2B0100") References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86EBB@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <40E59559.8090907@cronyx.ru> <p06002035bd0b4bebb128@[10.0.1.3]> <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
n0g0013 <ttz@cobbled.net> writes: >> Yup. PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't >> ever get stolen or compromised. That makes it much harder for >> someone to successfully impersonate you. > > what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i > investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant > to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). > > does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt > won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently > won't verify the content). gnus does it the same way as mutt (Emacs Mail Client). Arne -- compiling millions of tiny c-programs...done checking for a working configure script... not found
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867jtj4i4d.fsf>