From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 26 22:39:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA20881 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 22:39:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA20749; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 22:39:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20427; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:09:06 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA09976; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:09:05 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from grog) Message-ID: <19980127170905.39298@lemis.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:09:05 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Bill Paul , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another observation on -current and NFS References: <199801270559.AAA07933@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> <199801270630.BAA27457@dyson.iquest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e In-Reply-To: <199801270630.BAA27457@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 01:30:59AM -0500 Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 01:30:59AM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > Bill Paul said: >> >> [...] >>> #12 0xf0134384 in vfs_vmio_release (bp=0xf24e556c) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:756 >>> #13 0xf0134080 in brelse (bp=0xf24e556c) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:647 >>> #14 0xf0166316 in nfs_bioread (vp=0xf0508900, uio=0xf3a41e34, ioflag=8, cred=0xf0547b80, getpages=1) >>> at ../../nfs/nfs_bio.c:346 >>> #15 0xf0165b64 in nfs_getpages (ap=0xf3a41e70) at ../../nfs/nfs_bio.c:116 >> > > This is really wierd... nfs_getpages no-longer calls nfs_bioread, and > handles the I/O on it's own. We must not be talking about -current, are > we? :-). Grrr. I *hate* CVS. Yes, this was a version of the 12th December. It was *supposed* to be -current. I'll get the *(&(^*&^& to do what I mean, and I'll report. Greg