From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 27 17:14:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4767D16A419 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oscartheduck@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1DB13C48D for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oscartheduck@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so949830nfb for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=I/3JkQTVYdh3Ky/5ba8TVYPOfkCCVXWOenXsgfKCFC4=; b=V20LRYj0hdH094T8N2ZP8JVY9Xjs8VTJfxJokf0tHwdx/NFqw6oD5lq+i/KoIPUOet+s+jPgxb/UImAKAg+vhx/rP3nmq9N4V8lUCRfv1j1V18WQQdk/SbmZezeRBpHLp9oVUa19qdEz19ua70WOSVjkXKO5yb7XoWqXuj7Tgm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=f805DNiVBEFurtTV3Vd5oQkTcSpwv0VIcoFG9kgFFNVaXoOBL+aukRR8uSCLlDzaaDWT6U89BG1ZRJRavJyzytiOk5db4w1KTtN7BAFeO4x+bNc+pjriQcFLsrq05eLcAEUw943XFgDatNNW7bsvuAaoDU3Pm2ixIBOEpf51NVc= Received: by 10.78.176.20 with SMTP id y20mr3239811hue.1193505297492; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.135.8 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:14:57 -0600 From: James To: RW In-Reply-To: <20071027175637.768736df@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4722BAC1.9030906@optonline.net> <20071027103839.4a9393da@makeworld.com> <20071027175637.768736df@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade used to be fun!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:14:59 -0000 > > > Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of > > > those ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's > > > because portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is > > > not fun any more! Always an issue, either a port conflicts with > > > another port or it fails all together. I have forgotten the last > > > time I updated my ports without any issues. Today scrollkeeper is > > > conflicting with rarian, they install files on the same directory. > > > Go figure. Those were the days when it used to work. What would you like to see from ports? I mean, in the great tradition of BSD, let's work out what the problem is and write a script.