From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 23 14:13:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA24494 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 14:13:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from set.scient.com ([208.29.209.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA24488 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 14:13:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enkhyl@scient.com) Received: by set.scient.com; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA31647; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 14:12:22 -0800 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 14:11:17 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen X-Sender: enkhyl@ender.sf.scient.com Reply-To: cnielsen@pobox.com To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel threads In-Reply-To: <199811231952.MAA25806@usr02.primenet.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > it again (no, this code won't run in an unmodified FreeBSD because > of the VFS stacking problems FreeBSD has). It starts the helper Is the VFS stacking problem a result of the new VM implementation? What needs to be done to fix it? I'm curious because I was looking into writing an encrypting VFS layer, but I decided it was biting off more than I could chew when I discovered the VFS stacking problems. -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message