From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 8 01:27:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA14353 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 01:27:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (pm22-24.image.dk [194.234.169.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA14348 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 01:27:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@internet.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA00376; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:27:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@internet.dk) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 10:27:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland X-Sender: leifn@darla.swimsuit.internet.dk To: Doug White cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named.boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 5 May 1998, Doug White wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 1998, Leif Neland wrote: > > > Just wondering: Is there any reason why named doesn't fetch a new > > named.root with the root nameservers regularly? > > Well, it does, you just don't notice it nor does it actually write it > down. If you watch named do its thing with tcpdump sometime you'll see it > bothering the root servers when it's quiet and intuiting an updated list. > You can always grab a new one for yourself tho, it's in internic somewhere > :) > Well, why doesn't it write it down then? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message