Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:10:30 GMT From: Mikhail Teterin <Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/76116: PORT UPDATE: graphics/lcms (with PATCH) Message-ID: <200501202110.j0KLAUUn069825@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/76116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin <Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> To: Raphael Langerhorst <raphael-langerhorst@gmx.at> Cc: Volker Stolz <vs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/76116: PORT UPDATE: graphics/lcms (with PATCH) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:02:57 -0500 четвер 20 с╕чень 2005 15:36, Raphael Langerhorst Ви написали: > just took the time to check on this issue. I now patched the > graphics/lcms port with my own patch and installed it (WITHOUT the > additional configure arguments, I took the patch AS IS, this means > that --without-jpeg and --without-tiff were not added to the > configure args). > > Even though I used the patch the way it was, I didn't get any man > pages installed either (??) although I have no idea why. But they are > obviously not there. This means that they probably don't need to be > listed. > > The question would be of course: if the man pages get installed when > building & installing lcms manually, why are they NOT installed with > the port? Or do they get installed into a different location? I > didn't see them installing in the install output either... > > (in principle this shows that the upgrade is ok, the man-page / > no-manpage question probably doesn't have to do with the version > change as such) Check out the post-patch target in the port's Makefile -- and what it does to the list of SUBDIRS in the vendor's Makefile.in -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501202110.j0KLAUUn069825>