Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
To:        Cliff Addy <fbsdlist@federation.addy.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DNS setup problem, "Can't find server name" 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.990924090403.25810A-100000@java.dpcsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.990923225448.4580A-100000@federation.addy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Cliff Addy wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Dan Busarow wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Cliff Addy wrote:
> > > Actually, I think I may have found it.  The new named *insists* that
> > > certain files be located in /etc/namedb, even if named.conf tells it to
> >
> > No it doesn't.  My zone files and named.conf are in 
> > /usr/local/lib/named and everything works fine.  You can also 
> > give the hints file any name you want.  named.conf controls
> > all.  You _do_ need to tell named where to find named.conf if it's
> > not in /etc/namedb by using the -b /path/to/named.conf flag.
> 
> Well, that's precisely what I *had* set up.  It was finding the named.conf
> fine, with this at the top:
> 
>   options {
>       directory "/etc/named.data";
>       listen-on { 207.239.68.71; };
>   };
> 
> However, the error logs stated it could not find localhost.rev.  I created

That would make me suspicious.  My zone file for 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa
is db.127.0.0

Only place I've seen localhost.rev is in the FBSD *default* named.[boot|conf]
files.  I'll bet named was never reading your named.conf file at all.

> one in /etc/named.data, but the same message showed up.  ONLY when I moved
> it to /etc/namedb did the message disappear.  According to what I
> understand of named, the option above should have kept it from looking
> anywhere but /etc/named.data

Using absolute paths you can tell it to look elsewhere, but basically
you're right.

> So, then I moved all my other conf files into named.data and voila, all
> worked fine.  Just out of curiousity, which version of named/bind are you
> using?  The old system is only a few months old and did not even want/need
> this "localhost.rev" file and worked fine with the identical directory
> structure I was originally using on the new box. I'm thinking this
> prediliction for /etc/namedb is unique to one version. 

I'm using 8.2.1

What do you have for named_flags in /etc/rc.conf ?

Dan
-- 
 Dan Busarow                                                  949 443 4172
 Dana Point Communications, Inc.                            dan@dpcsys.com
 Dana Point, California  83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4   8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990924090403.25810A-100000>