From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jul 28 10:33:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2302637B876 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13IE0i-0005QQ-00; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:33:24 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA61126; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:33:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:33:23 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux kernel and FreeBSD neck and neck? Message-ID: <20000728183323.A61025@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20000728124727.A58850@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000728102959.J17222@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000728102959.J17222@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:29:59AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:29:59AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Is that how linux gets its performance? hearsay? > > I now declare that a i386 box running FreeBSD is faster than a 64 > CPU onyx, I don't have benchmarks available right now, but if you > can bear with me for a while... Excuse me, waiter, but I believe i ordered the EXTRA bitter sarcasm... jm -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org "The physicist's greatest tool is his wastebasket." - Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message