From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 21:31:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A7337B401 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 21:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seed.net.tw (sn13.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E131C43FA3 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 21:31:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leafy@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw) Received: from [210.64.32.187] (port=49568 helo=chihiro.leafy.idv.tw) by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.14:2) id 19GWsk-000IpB-TM for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 12:31:47 +0800 Received: from chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (nobody@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4G4VjCI001008 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 12:31:46 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from leafy@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw) Received: (from leafy@localhost) by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4G4VjcK001007 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 12:31:45 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from leafy) Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:31:45 +0800 From: leafy To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030516043145.GA981@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <20030516041445.GA886@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <3EC4688D.7070207@btc.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EC4688D.7070207@btc.adaptec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: Is it possible to include gcj in the system gcc suite? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 04:31:49 -0000 On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:53PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > Highly unlikely unless the current gcc maintainer(s) decide to do it. > Be warned that this is prime bikeshed territory. Since installing > alternate compilers is quite easy, doing so might be your best bet. > > Scott > I looked into ports/lang/gcc33 and see that gcj is included by default, but then again, I'll have 2 sets of the same compiler just to get gcj support if the system compiler gets bumped. I am hoping that the maintainers could add a switch in make.conf like "WITH_GCJ=true" for those who would want it. Just my 2 cents, Jiawei Ye -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming