Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:35:13 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case) Message-ID: <4C0D03A1.3040100@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100605233947.00006cce@unknown> References: <4C04CAAA.7080001@janh.de> <20100603123728.GA1605@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100603150208.19603v4b90d4jeec@webmail.leidinger.net> <4C09010A.7010906@janh.de> <20100605233947.00006cce@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto:
> The best solution would be to fix the ports to not link explicitely to
> indirect deps (by improving libtool and by improving the .pc files
> for pkg-config). Then we could even switch from recording indirect
> dependencies in /var/db/pkg/<port>-<version>/+{CONTENTS,REQUIRED_BY} to
> only record direct deps.
How hard is it? What prevents us in doing it? Later we modify libtool
upstream, later we could switch to record only direct dependencies.
--
Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0D03A1.3040100>