From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 5 01:26:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC6216A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 01:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6285043D31 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 01:26:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sigsegv@mail.ru) Received: from [83.216.136.238] (port=49251 helo=mail.ru) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1BWWUe-000Km3-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:25:32 +0400 Message-ID: <40C185CF.2020709@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:35:27 +0100 From: sigsegv@mail.ru User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031207 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected Subject: termcap vs terminfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 08:26:05 -0000 I've noticed that the base system does not have terminfo, but instead comes with termcap. Apparently BSD always had termcap and System V had terminfo. I don't want to start a religious war as to which one is better, but only want to ask if anyone has experienced problems when porting ncurses applications from BSD to System V and vice versa, and what could be done to minimise such problems. Thanks.