From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 6 13:58:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389B516A4D3 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 13:58:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sockar.homeip.net (tourist.net8.nerim.net [213.41.176.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D2B43D95 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 13:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amon@sockar.homeip.net) Received: from sockar.homeip.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sockar.homeip.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j46DvUV3048208; Fri, 6 May 2005 15:57:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from amon@sockar.homeip.net) Received: (from amon@localhost) by sockar.homeip.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j46DvUJK048207; Fri, 6 May 2005 15:57:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from amon) Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:57:30 +0200 From: Herve Boulouis To: Anton Turygin Message-ID: <20050506135730.GC71715@ra.aabs> References: <20050506130002.L13748@colt.tsua.net> <20050506121942.GB71715@ra.aabs> <20050506162412.G91866@colt.tsua.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050506162412.G91866@colt.tsua.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 2120S FreeBSD 4.11 poor performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 13:58:30 -0000 Le 06/05/2005 16:26, Anton Turygin a écrit: > > Read Cache Setting : ENABLE > Write Cache Setting : ENABLE ALWAYS > Write Cache Status : Active, not protected, battery not present > > The array speed is up to 35 MB/s (it is still not enough). this is typically the throughput you get with U160 drives. This should go up to 70 MB/s with U320 drives (YMMV, but this is what I usually get here with RAID 5 arrays of 3-5 disks). Also keep in mind that the 2120S is not a performance monster (the 2200S seems better on this point) > The only thing - I didn't have succes in turning the Read Cache off. You have to do all the changes in 1 command : container set cache /read_cache_enable=false /unprotected=true 0 -- Herve Boulouis