From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 8 16:30:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA10401 for current-outgoing; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 16:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA10393; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 16:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704082329.QAA10393@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA245011847; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:24:07 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: ipfilter-proff.shar.gz To: proff@suburbia.net Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:24:07 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19970408223424.25890.qmail@suburbia.net> from "proff@suburbia.net" at Apr 9, 97 08:34:23 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk There was one other issue I'd like to see resolved and that was how IP Filter should be included within FreeBSD if the current layout isn't satisfactory. I recall the last email I read on the subject was from Julian, but in this, i really need a decision made by someone who is authorised to make that sort of decision before any changes to the current layout are made. Darren