From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul 23 21:16:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA11153
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 21:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA11102
          for <current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 21:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA08760; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 22:11:52 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199607240411.WAA08760@rover.village.org>
To: Darryl Okahata <darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com>
Subject: Re: 2.2 SNAP soon? 
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, current@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 23 Jul 1996 11:32:16 PDT
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 22:11:51 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

:      I assume that 2.7.2 (or whatever) is "adequately stable/bug-free"?
: I'd hate to see lots of mysterious kernel and user-land bugs pop-up ....

I'd recommend that we use 2.7.3 (or the set of patches that is ready
to go for that) if we do a snap on a non 2.6 compiler.  There are a
lot of bugs fixed in that that people tripped over on intel.

Warner