From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Mar 1 12:34:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA28195 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 12:34:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA28180 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 12:34:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.4/8.6.9) id PAA01318; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 15:34:34 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199703012034.PAA01318@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge To: henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu (Charles Henrich) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 15:34:34 -0500 (EST) Cc: toor@dyson.iquest.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199703012019.PAA01127@crh.cl.msu.edu> from "Charles Henrich" at Mar 1, 97 03:19:07 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > In lists.freebsd.chat you write: > > >> On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > >> > > >> > I also saw Dyson's box PPro 233 Mhz clocking at 352k ... > >> > >I'll be running my machine at nights and when I am away. You > >know that kernel work does necessitate lots of reboots at > >times (especially when I work on it :-)). > > How does one get 233 Mhz out of a PPro system? > I am running a Supermicro P6DNF (hope to add another processor when the single-processor work dies down, to assist in the SMP work/optimization.) The P6DNF has the following jumpers (from the 'net'): >From - Wed Nov 20 22:03:26 1996 Path: szdc-e!super.zippo.com!zdc-e!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.dfw.net!news From: ottoman@gte.net (Ron Gazaway) Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.supermicro Subject: Re: Overclocking PPro 200 to 233 on P6DNE? Date: 20 Nov 1996 12:50:40 GMT Organization: Ottoman Technologies Lines: 74 Distribution: world Message-ID: <56uur0$7di@fnord.dfw.net> References: <56kp7q$9bm@newsops.execpc.com> <32911B60.3E6A@ccu1.auckland.ac.nz> <01bbd6df$118376e0$3ba377c2@mjs.u-net.com> Reply-To: ottoman@gte.net NNTP-Posting-Host: bigboy.ottotech.com X-Newsreader: News for Windows NT X1.0-92 To the best of my knowledge (verifications performed on P6DNF) BaseFreq. Clock Multiplier ------------ ---------------------------- Base Mult CPU JP36 JP37 JP32 JP31 JP30 JP29 Verified Freq. Clock ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------- 60 2 120 1 0 1 1 1 1 No 66 2 132 0 1 1 1 1 1 Yes 60 2.5 150 1 0 1 1 1 0 Yes 66 2.5 165 0 1 1 1 1 0 Yes 60 3 180 1 0 1 1 0 1 Yes 66 3 198 0 1 1 1 0 1 Yes 60 3.5 210 1 0 1 1 0 0 No 66 3.5 231 0 1 1 1 0 0 Yes 60 4 240 1 0 1 0 1 1 Yes 66 4 264 0 1 1 0 1 1 No Base Frequency CPU Clock Multiplier MHz JP36 JP37 Mult. JP32 JP31 JP30 JP29 60 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 66 0 1 2.5 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 0 1 3.5 1 1 0 0 4 1 0 1 1 4.5 1 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 1 5.5 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 1 1 Note that the bios startup screen does not always report the correct speed, you'll need verify the speed by running some test program that is purely CPU Clock dependent.