From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 15 12:02:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0523716A4CE; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:02:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DAB1243D2D; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:02:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vs@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (vs@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i6FC2eQA039484;	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:02:40 GMT
	(envelope-from vs@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from vs@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6FC2eIV039480;
	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:02:40 GMT
	(envelope-from vs)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:02:40 GMT
From: Volker Stolz <vs@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200407151202.i6FC2eIV039480@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: kwm@rainbow-runner.nl, vs@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, vs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/69052: Maintainer-update switch workrave to new gtkmm
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:02:41 -0000

Synopsis: Maintainer-update switch workrave to new gtkmm

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: vs
State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 15 12:01:06 GMT 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
I don't have any problems with GCC 2 on 4.10. Should I drop the USE_GCC?
BTW, I *think* (but am not sure) that dropping the suffix from LIB_DEPENDS
should work as well and avoid chasing any bumps the libs make.

Volker


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->vs
Responsible-Changed-By: vs
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jul 15 12:01:06 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I'll handle this.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=69052