From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 03:46:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE9E37B404 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 03:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A42443F75 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 03:46:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: (qmail 52069 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2003 10:46:16 -0000 Received: from celduin.net (HELO anduin.net) (81.0.162.106) by anduin.net with SMTP; 4 Aug 2003 10:46:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:46:08 +0200 From: Eirik Oeverby To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-Id: <20030804124608.4188d92e.ltning@anduin.net> In-Reply-To: <20030804094554.GL95375@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20030731045030.GH33447@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030731093031.17deae97.ltning@anduin.net> <20030804044432.GV95375@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030803.235155.123970624.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030804094554.GL95375@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.E:p0rQ1c+Xa_1(" cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lucent IBSS mode doesn't work in -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:46:22 -0000 --=.E:p0rQ1c+Xa_1( Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry, I missed the point that it had once worked. However, the point still needs to be made that in the past I have had varying success with various firmware revisions, but the latest revision is the only one that has worked everywhere I have tried it. Good thing I didn't install the kernel I built yesterday, if that means my wi-driven lucent card would stop working =) To the maintainers: Take your time. Better do it right than do it quick and dirty. It works in 4.x, and 5.x is not considered stable yet so if anyone expects everything to work they are in error. /Eirik On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 19:15:54 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 4 August 2003 at 11:37:44 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > > At 11:51 PM -0600 2003/08/03, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > >> In message: <20030804044432.GV95375@wantadilla.lemis.com> > >> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: > >> > >>> On Thursday, 31 July 2003 at 9:30:31 +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Oh and btw.. Get the *latest* firmware onto all your cards. That > >is>>> essential for anything to work right at all.. > >>> > >>> That sounds wrong to me. If it worked before, and it doesn't now, > >>> that's not the fault of the firmware. > >> > >> Quit harping on it, ok. We know there's a bug and carping like > >this> makes me less willing to find and fix it. > > > > I'm confused. I agree that I have sometimes found Greg to be a > > bit annoying, but it seems to me that he's asking a perfectly > > legitimate question -- if things worked fine in the past (including > > the firmware versions at the time), and they don't work now, then > > why is a firmware update needed? > > > > I would ask: > > > > What changed so that things broke, and why can't we go back > > to the way things worked before? > > I think you're misunderstanding Warner. He's not disagreeing. My > message wasn't directed at Warner, it was directed at Eirik. > > Greg > -- > See complete headers for address and phone numbers > --=.E:p0rQ1c+Xa_1( Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Ljl0dAvR8ct7fEcRAgXyAJ9r/V49NhESslGSh6W7VXrLzdXXxgCcCJj8 zPLlATty1jvheOvZp19aYEM= =hwAG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.E:p0rQ1c+Xa_1(--