From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 24 07:27:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8994E16A4CE; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:27:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6041343D31; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:27:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 081F714952; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 02:27:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 02:27:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Eric Anholt In-Reply-To: <200504232117.j3NLHumH092580@leguin.anholt.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/80291: repocopy request from xorg-server to xorg-server-snap X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:27:38 -0000 Any reason why would would choose -snap instead of -devel? I think we have more of the latter than the former.