From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 16:01:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C25416A536; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [216.9.132.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BC513C4A7; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069CE7E8D6; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:01:35 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gOurAM6EdDY; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:01:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [156.56.12.213] (loony.uits.indiana.edu [156.56.12.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B587E8D4; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:01:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <45B3FD3C.8090501@freebsd.org> References: <9888aa630701210705r533a1085x9a06f26ee834d173@mail.gmail.com> <45B3FD3C.8090501@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4810BF4B-C95D-461F-BA37-D8A32780AD10@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:01:29 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:01:34 -0000 Hi Colin, I just discovered freebsd-update, and one thing I'm not sure of based on both the freebsd-update website and manpage is whether specifying a branch is necessary after I've recompiled world in the past if no kerberos/crypt related options are present in make.conf overriding the defaults? Is the specification of the branch only necessary if you want to abide by your make.conf overrides, and if you have none, the branch argument is optional? On Jan 21, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > eoghan wrote: >> Hi >> I am trying to run the freebsd-update, so as root I do: >> /usr/local/sbin/freebsd-update fetch >> And I get: >> Fetching public key... >> fetch: http://update.daemonology.net/amd64/6.1/pub.key: Not Found > > Updates aren't being built for amd64 for the version of FreeBSD Update > in the ports tree. If you upgrade to FreeBSD 6.2, you can use the > version of FreeBSD Update which it contains (for which amd64 updates > are being built). > > Colin Percival > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org"