From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 13 12:16:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66E216A4CE; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:16:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4053143D49; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:16:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3DCGXTd080976; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:16:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost)j3DCGXwI080971; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:16:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.chesapeake.net: jroberson owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:16:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Alfred Perlstein In-Reply-To: <20050413070414.GY60345@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20050413081543.S28571@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20050409085414.M28571@mail.chesapeake.net> <20050409132339.GJ60345@elvis.mu.org> <20050409134626.GL60345@elvis.mu.org> <20050409095543.N28571@mail.chesapeake.net> <20050409100534.M28571@mail.chesapeake.net> <20050413022133.Y28571@mail.chesapeake.net> <20050413070414.GY60345@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Jeff Roberson cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys namei.h src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:16:37 -0000 On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jeff Roberson [050412 23:22] wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > Thank you very much. I'll update the docs when you're done. > > > > Don't you only need to know which calls are going to open, or do you also > > need modifying ops like unlike and rename? > > Autofs does not support rename and unlink semantics were not as > important as being able to differentiate between open(2) and stat(2). So would an ISOPEN flag work? We could do this rather than replace NOOBJ in every syscall you don't care about. I'm trying to figure out if the positive cases are fewer than the negative. > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 >