From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 2 17:26:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1787116A4DF for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2043D58 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1383792wxd for ; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.8.8 with SMTP id 8mr4663367wxh; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i19sm5046799wxd.2006.09.02.10.26.03; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C62AC5E7 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:26:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C51BC5E1 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:26:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k82HPwss060514 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:25:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:25:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060901125631.GA92179@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060901115919.6B6F.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609021325.58177.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Why sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:26:08 -0000 --nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 02 September 2006 11:31, Atom Powers wrote: [...] > By making the Postfix port /not/ disable Sendmail it gives you the > ability to, more easily, run Sendmail *and* Postfix on the same > machine. ie it doesn't break your current configuation. Why would I want Sendmail running in conjunction with a properly functionin= g=20 Postfix installation? I can only imagine problems resulting from such a=20 venture. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net The truth about a man lies first and foremost in what he hides. Andre Malraux --nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE+b6ls3R1WQUU6lgRAlONAJ0WN8wHMTizQZp9XwH4jselwBsbBACfeN4r 3SgVReKpdcGbFuBZz1S60BM= =zGhW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X--