From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 00:41:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8F716A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:41:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A26843D1D for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinmcc@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.16.199] (unknown [192.168.16.199]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8188820034 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:47:04 +0100 (BST) From: Martin McCann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <347498369.20050329222031@wanadoo.fr> References: 6667 <20050328142522.40982.qmail@web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com> <1802825135.20050328164920@wanadoo.fr> <8C701C5A7BE6FEE-4B8-3F7A1@mblk-d50.sysops.aol.com> <1873266905.20050328201452@wanadoo.fr> <8C701F3D30DD9E0-418-84A@mblk-d49.sysops.aol.com> <166745080.20050329000307@wanadoo.fr> <8C701FD99D77BA3-418-1271@mblk-d49.sysops.aol.com> <336611005.20050329064359@wanadoo.fr> <8C7029BC7FFDCF4-FA4-65B4@mblk-r21.sysops.aol.com> <738586666.20050329210240@wanadoo.fr> <8C702B0415B9B8E-E8C-82C8@mblk-d21.sysops.aol.com> <347498369.20050329222031@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:41:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1112143266.661.11.camel@orker.orbweavers.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hyper threading. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: martinmcc@orbweavers.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:41:08 -0000 On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:20 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > em1897@aol.com writes: > > > Thats because you seem unable to grasp modern concepts. > > None were under discussion. As far as you can see, which shows the limit of your percption. > > > If you think that performance criteria > > of modern controllers and processors are the same > > as 30 years ago, then you are incapable of commenting > > on anything modern. > > The principles of "modern" controllers are surprisingly similar to those > of "old" controllers. The biggest change is that the PC world is only > now discovering what mainframe designers knew 40 years ago. Bollocks. >