From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org  Sun Jun 12 16:39:16 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E3AAF14E2
 for <freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 12 Jun 2016 16:39:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0E92A6B
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 16:39:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1bC8Pt-000F0R-K6; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 18:39:17 +0200
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 18:39:17 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com>
Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: qjail or qjail2?
Message-ID: <20160612163917.GF41922@home.opsec.eu>
References: <6d708ff4-de99-bfc5-f2d7-2568fa368256@gjunka.com>
 <20160612130722.GC41922@home.opsec.eu>
 <3fe16418-124d-d591-043e-9aad854e7df8@gjunka.com>
 <575D8358.2070508@gmail.com>
 <7b5e74b1-4c77-f9e6-056b-d4c91cbf961f@gjunka.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7b5e74b1-4c77-f9e6-056b-d4c91cbf961f@gjunka.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 16:39:16 -0000

Hi!

> It would certainly help if:
>   - the version of qjail supporting legacy systems was named qjail0 
> rather than qjail2

That ship probably has sailed.

>   - or the version of qjail supporting FreeBSD RELEASE-10.0 was named 
> qjail3 (or qjail4 since 4 is its minor revision now)
>   - or/and the message for qjail2 simply stated:
> 
> "This version supports FreeBSD RELEASE 8.x and 9.x. For RELEASE 10.0 and 
> newer use qjail."

Would you please submit a PR that makes this change to pkg-descr or such ?

If maintainer agrees, this would clarify it for future generations to come 8-}

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !