From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 23:17:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112F216AD62 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7AB446B1 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:59:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6FC1A3C2B; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B25951593; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:59:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:59:31 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20051124195930.GA19106@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:17:17 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> 540 534 99 pdwak 2000= =20 > >> cpu0: > >> time > >> 16825 pdpgs 2000= =20 > >> cpu1: > >> time > >> > >> > >>on FreeBSD 5.3 live CD i have 100 not 2000 times per second > >> > >>isn't it too much?! > > > >No, it's just a consequence of HZ=3D1000 instead of HZ=3D100. I've >=20 >=20 > so why 2000 not 1000? >=20 > 2000 on each processor! Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you, but it's really not unless you're on a very slow machine (like a 486). Kris --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhhuiWry0BWjoQKURAiUMAJ0ZrsFGY8pFcrwbce8Xjk+nD0fEhACgtxLs KiqLdcaAkQS89SXVrPWdZH8= =SQLB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--