From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 12:34:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FCF1065672 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A5B8FC0C for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBICYLEJ089821; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:34:21 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru) Message-ID: <4D0CAA48.7000901@rdtc.ru> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:34:16 +0600 From: Eugene Grosbein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100712 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: syrinx@freebsd.org References: <86wrn7gxvd.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20101218110358.GY33073@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kostik Belousov , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Golub Subject: Re: bsnmp/snmpmod.h: #include is missed X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:34:25 -0000 On 18.12.2010 18:01, Shteryana Shopova wrote: >>> bsnmp/snmpmod.h uses SLIST but does not includes . This breaks >>> net-mgmt/bsnmp-ucd port (ports/153153). >>> >>> Could somebody look at the attached patch? >> >> , as well as should be included before >> other headers. >> > > And the explicit includes of those files should be removed from the > sources of the bsnmpd(1) modules, I think. I will put this in SVN > along with a couple of other patches I have for bsnmp in my queue. > Sorry for not being able to reply sooner after this problem was > reported. Also, the bsnmptools port should be marked as obsolete as > the tools are now in head. I don't think that a port should be marked obsoled due to changes in head. People tend to use releases or STABLE. For now, ports tree support RELENG_7 and RELENG_8, so we should keep POLA until bsnmptool backported to branches and releases with bsnmptool are out. Eugene Grosbein