From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 09:02:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C5416A4CE; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [81.176.202.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8159A43D48; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6DAB1707E; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:02:09 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:02:09 +0700 From: Max Khon To: Alexander Kabaev Message-ID: <20040730090209.GA91408@samodelkin.net> References: <20040727021820.GA46021@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040727102021.GA73927@samodelkin.net> <20040729021919.GA47196@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040730035800.GA21238@regency.nsu.ru> <20040730040741.GA42165@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040730053019.GA89254@samodelkin.net> <20040730054522.GA57090@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040730054522.GA57090@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: Alexey Dokuchaev cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: GCC 3.4.2 snapshot import is imminent X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:33 -0000 Hi! On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:45:22AM +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > There is a trivial patch for one .info file which adds all the > > FreeBSD-specific options to gcc.1. > > Which I assume haven't changed a bit since Oct 2003? You (FreeBSD gcc maintainer) said that you are not interested in this patch. I did not update it since that time. > > There is a trivial patch for bmake glue that installs gcc.1 from > > gcc distribution (src/contrib/gcc/doc/gcc.1) > > instead of gcc 2.95.x manual (src/contrib/gcc/gcc.1) > > that is currently being installed. > > > > Both exist since Oct 2003. > > In their worthless state, yes. Hint: cvs log on contrib/gcc/gcc.1. > As I said, I am perfectly fine with someone taking over gcc man page > maintenance. > This will have to be done outside of GCC tree in contrib though. ^^^^ This is the first constructive reply from you since several people approached me asking why gcc.1 in 5.x is man page for 2.95.x. I will take this route. No problems! > The task is not as trivial as some might mistakenly believe. > > This is the last message on this subject I am willing to write. I never thought that maintaining gcc is trivial. I worked with previous gcc maintainers in the past. I HIGHLY appreciate your commitment. But I do not think that it is acceptable to pretend that the problem does not exist or to bash every attempt to make things better. /fjoe