From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 15 15:04:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDABD6D10F for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AD61130 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AD3D9D6D10E; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3E1D6D10C for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm17-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm17-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79965112F for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1494860651; bh=JzGouQlTLRxPu3RNS4DSwh5HA7etIUoYv8lc70RHXB4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=gz4G5YoNXFQQuVOUH/iyWw322zRPmGEe1Ct8Ek6Nl8rGCKxDpYRZ8JHPB8RNxvD7e8uzTdaKgP3z3kZE9LWX5MGlUYTgh2E1e8KZQ9cM/nzYICUdYqZvOrzfcr3IA8tEeEG5GDrLxSGCnQi8NdeWaSoq4fHfHc1iAYAMyZ3dFug= Received: from [216.39.60.173] by nm17.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 May 2017 15:04:11 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.118] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 May 2017 15:04:11 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 May 2017 15:04:11 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 118926.78769.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kb1h9TQVM1neprb_2bnooVljvJmwOkCce36E1gOqawogMiw JcccJMHUr_DX5p0sOVQG7ssqRZutOph8WCoIM.03L_rWQ0bDn9v4jSp6G2kH 4eOM1hEmvIZ5QBqF1B_AbXCaDArHAFOqF.pDMfQp6_ebRdc4k7gdOa7SXZyY 5k9lj7NvisdXs8WHWFVw22Zf1K14MIQujZIJPTOyfQ51j7E92d2uZpw_ydgC JwbA5VFkeN.ofzm8t_bzQLgTxdCZZWDYWuc.2LnwIGHQ8Xtoy2GfWsXmC01. 5d_WtFD7W83Tlbv6Llpa49gXfjHwqEPqmwViBgsudmDJFWx0CYyisN9SBQgl qYJgSoeQql_CBQWWNS5k.9Az95iy7vBkLCCp5kp3FI3LfRuO_ttpiXOE0KhW Vu0yjmXUPsYp3Z6pOz56.07bkL033I6BGJpRsfNveWACygsEQ4RppIkqzCZv buqt8VlyQtgQOcm2qHeY8JNesezj4SNCrK3ONu3vpnjAtRP7ZSg7OEuq0Lis FCLKeaGENpxOCcnjHaJlCcMs0rHUqM7OSf8A6Jg71GnhlVNyqEYFthVcU X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: Rodrigo Osorio Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: How should we name node-js ports ? Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 11:04:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:04:18 -0000 [Default] On Sun, 14 May 2017 14:16:23 +0200, Rodrigo Osorio wrote: >Hi, > >I have a bunch of nodejs ports to add, most of them as dependencies, >and I wonder if we can find a naming standard like adding 'node' or >'node-js' prefix in the name ; I personally prefer 'node'. > >As a result a port who install the node package xxx will be named 'node-xxx' > >Does it sounds good to you ? Since "node" already has a well-established general meaning that has no immediate connection to software, it'd be much less confusing to use "nodejs", since that *does* have a direct and immediate connection to the software ports you plan to add.