From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 2 18:16:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA21344 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.risc.org (taob@trt-on1-03.netcom.ca [207.181.81.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA21336 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (taob@localhost) by alpha.risc.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA01242; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 21:11:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 21:11:56 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao To: Michael Smith cc: "Bror 'Count' Heinola" , hasty@rah.star-gate.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, FREEBSD-CHAT-L Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) In-Reply-To: <199703030024.KAA23122@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > > Someone should try reducing the rate of timer/clock interrupts; > Amancio only needs about another 2% to get past 400K 8) Would "rtprio 0 -" help? I'd use that more, if it didn't lock up my machine while the process was running. :( -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"