From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 10 14:18:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FC237B7BF for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:18:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA22063; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:50:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:50:06 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Matt Heckaman Cc: FreeBSD QUESTIONS Subject: Re: pthreads on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20000310145004.H14279@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 05:10:52PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Matt Heckaman [000310 14:48] wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is any way to have a full pthreads implimentation > on FreeBSD 3.4. What's implimented in libc_r is not nearly enough for most > applications, especially one that I *need* running. Until now, I've never > seen a UNIX-ish O/S not have a complete pthreads implimentation, I'm sure > that there must be a reason for this, but I'm unaware of it. Also, I hear > that 4.0 has much better pthreads, but upgrading to that is not an option. Can you be more specific? What's missing? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message