From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 24 10:11:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA16731 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:11:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ux7.cso.uiuc.edu (swwilso1@ux7.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA16665 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:11:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swwilso1@students.uiuc.edu) Received: from localhost (swwilso1@localhost) by ux7.cso.uiuc.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA10003; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 12:10:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: ux7.cso.uiuc.edu: swwilso1 owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 12:10:47 -0500 (CDT) From: steven wesley wilson X-Sender: swwilso1@ux7.cso.uiuc.edu To: Chris Dillon cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Supported Hardware in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks for responding, I'm interested in the Celeron because it is a cheap alternative. I realize it has not L2 cache, but through overclocking I understand you can drive the processer at close to p2 350 performance. If this is the case(I know people who are doing it), I thought I'ld save a few bucks. Any thoughts. > Anyway, is there any particlar reason you want a Celeron processor? > Those have no L2 cache, and performance can suffer badly. The Celeron > was meant to be bought by people who had no idea what it was missing. Steve Wilson swwilso1@uiuc.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message