Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:32:15 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thank you (for making the ports less boring). Message-ID: <4E6EA48F.9050001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E6E99BC.4050909@missouri.edu> References: <1315864556.1747.103.camel@xenon> <20110912190558.641a3219@seibercom.net> <20110912230943.GD33455@guilt.hydra> <4E6E99BC.4050909@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/12/2011 16:46, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > We all make mistakes from time to time. Michal could have pointed out > the mistake and still been nice about it. I know for myself that when I > make a mistake like this that I feel bad enough as it is, and I don't > need anyone rubbing it in. Having just posted about his ongoing problems with ports stability I can feel Michal's pain, so hopefully we can all agree to cut *each other* some slack, and move on. :) Meanwhile, as someone else suggested 'portmaster -w' is a good tool here, and if you want to be really thorough (at the risk of potentially upgrading more than you need to) then 'portmaster -r gdbm' will kill the gnat with a hammer, so to speak. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6EA48F.9050001>