Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 May 2012 09:27:42 -0400
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
Subject:   Re: Major performance hit with ToS setting
Message-ID:  <4FBF88CE.20209@cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sLxFJ18ANO7nQqLetnJiT-K6pHC-X3yT1dWuWGa0VLUg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAN6yY1sLxFJ18ANO7nQqLetnJiT-K6pHC-X3yT1dWuWGa0VLUg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/24/12 18:55, Kevin Oberman wrote:

>
> This is,of course, on a 10G interface. On 7.3 there is little

Hi Kevin,


What you're seeing looks almost like a checksum is bad, or
there is some other packet damage.  Do you see any
error counters increasing if you run netstat -s before
and after the test & compare the results?

Thinking that, perhaps, this was a bug in my mxge(4), I attempted
to reproduce it this morning between  8.3 and 9.0 boxes and
failed to see the bad behavior..

% nuttcp-6.1.2 -c32t -t diablo1-m < /dev/zero
  9161.7500 MB /  10.21 sec = 7526.5792 Mbps 53 %TX 97 %RX 0 
host-retrans 0.11 msRTT
% nuttcp-6.1.2  -t diablo1-m < /dev/zero
  9140.6180 MB /  10.21 sec = 7509.8270 Mbps 53 %TX 97 %RX 0 
host-retrans 0.11 msRTT


However, I don't have any 8.2-r box handy, so I cannot
exactly repro your experiment...


Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FBF88CE.20209>