Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Mar 1999 11:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
From:      hm@kts.org (Hellmuth Michaelis)
To:        balu@dva.in-berlin.de (Boris Staeblow)
Cc:        freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: if_spppsubr.c/if_sppp.h which version is better?
Message-ID:  <m10SH4X-00002gC@bert.kts.org>
In-Reply-To: <19990330221111.A3853@dva.in-berlin.de> from Boris Staeblow at "Mar 30, 1999 10:11:11 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Staeblow wrote:

> i'm using FreeBSD-stable and i've integrated the i4b-0.71 with
> the overinstall-script.
> 
> During this operation the if_spppsubr.c is replaced with an older
> one. Is it better to use the -stable part or should I use
> the replaced source? Or is it unimportant at all?

I have no idea. Try it out !

> BTW: is it planned to commit the latest i4b to -stable?

No.

hellmuth
-- 
Hellmuth Michaelis                hm@kts.org                   Hamburg, Europe
 We all live in a yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine ...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m10SH4X-00002gC>