From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 23:16:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C39A5A; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 23:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C889F6A; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 23:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA4NG9X7094536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id sA4NG9J0094533; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris H Subject: Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2) In-Reply-To: <14d0c0b9ee9ca31877d43a3c29481717@ultimatedns.net> Message-ID: References: <20141031185621.GC15967@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54573B31.7080809@gmx.de>, <20141103212438.0893c3dc@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <14d0c0b9ee9ca31877d43a3c29481717@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:16:10 -0700 (MST) Cc: Tijl Coosemans , Matthias Andree , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:16:28 -0000 On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: > gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, > mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the "slack" > you appear to be referring to. zfs(8) also has this ability. Not alignment, but filesystem block size. But that can only be set for an entire filesystem, and it's a tradeoff.