From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 7 4:52:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177A37B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 04:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA15877; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 04:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 04:52:35 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: j mckitrick Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: .net threat ? Message-ID: <20001007045235.A15854@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <20001006025604.C55421@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001006025604.C55421@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:56:04AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:56:04AM +0100, j mckitrick wrote: > > >From what I have read lately, M$ just might be onto something with this .NET > idea. According to an article on Oreillynet, they are changing their > approach, and this time learning from some of their past mistakes. Does > this have any great impact on the ongoing OS war? Any thoughts? Yeah, stop being so eager to believe everything you read ;-) Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message