From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Sep 24 04:28:45 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA21081
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 04:28:45 -0700
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA21070
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 04:28:44 -0700
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA05314; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 04:28:36 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199509241128.EAA05314@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Odd SCSI errors
To: bmk@dtr.com
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 04:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199509221522.IAA00446@everest> from "bmk@dtr.com" at Sep 22, 95 08:22:14 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 657       
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Can anyone explain the meaning of the following SCSI errors?
> 
> Sep 22 06:47:50 everest /kernel: bt0: bt_scsi_cmd, more than 33 DMA segs
> Sep 22 06:47:50 everest /kernel: sd0: oops not queued

Something has asked for a transfer that is too big..
I wonder if the clustering code can cluster up a read/write that is too
big for the device?

> Sep 22 06:47:50 everest /kernel: biodone: buffer already done
> Sep 22 06:47:50 everest /kernel: sd0(bt0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:21,0
> 	Logical block address out of range field replaceable 
> 	unit: 3 sks:cf,2

I think this is a bad interpretation of the error above it..
its a byproduct.. ignore it

>