From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 24 21:48:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA29786 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from picnic.mat.net (picnic.mat.net [209.118.174.117]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA29776 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:48:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chuckr@glue.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost) by picnic.mat.net (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA14345; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 23:45:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 23:45:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey X-Sender: chuckr@picnic.mat.net To: Kent A Vander Velden cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads across processors In-Reply-To: <199808242253.RAA27685@isua4.iastate.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, Kent A Vander Velden wrote: > > Hi. Does -current support spliting the threads of a single process > across multiple processors? Current still has user threads, which are pretty much unaware of which processor there on. There's been work towards kernel threads, but it's not yet to the point that you can play with it. > > Thanks. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@glue.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 213 Lakeside Drive Apt T-1 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic (FreeBSD-current) (301) 220-2114 | and jaunt (NetBSD). ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message