Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 06:11:52 -0500 (CDT) From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: mpp@mpp.minn.net, peter@taronga.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bad superblock? Message-ID: <199509061111.GAA14651@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199509060142.SAA25004@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 5, 95 06:42:12 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Peter wants the fsck to honor the clean flag, but doesn't want to update > to a file system type that supports clean flags in the first place. No, I don't want the fsck to honor the clean flag. Never said I did. I want it to *ignore* it, along with any other fields it doesn't understand. Alternatively, if the superblock doesn't get written normally on a umount, the clean flag shouldn't have been there either.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509061111.GAA14651>