From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 11  3: 2:20 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dns1.kema.nl (dns1.kema.nl [194.53.253.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A89C15366; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:02:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jaap@114046.kema.nl)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dns1.kema.nl (8.9.1a/8.6.12) id MAA04339; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:02:15 +0100 (MET)
Received: by dns1.kema.nl via smap (V1.3)
	id sma004074; Tue, 11 Jan 00 12:01:48 +0100
Received: from 114046.kema.nl ([194.53.231.193]) by emma.kema.nl (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA23496; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:06:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 114046.kema.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by 114046.kema.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09106;
	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:07:24 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jaap@114046.kema.nl)
Message-Id: <200001111107.MAA09106@114046.kema.nl>
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?) 
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 10 Jan 2000 20:57:10 -0800.
             <20000110205710.D98651@relay.nuxi.com> 
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:07:24 +0100
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@nic.nl>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


    And the triva question is why was there 1BSD, 2BSD, 3BSD, and
    then the switch to 4.0BSD - 4.4BSD.


As far as I remember, 1BSD was v6 stuff only BSD internal distributions
(and good friends) with Pascal & ex; 2BSD was for v7 licences with
csh (job control) and vi; 3BSD for v32 licences and virtual memory
for the VAX and with 4BSD FFS was introduced, lisp and for DARPA
later on networking stuff in 4.1c. Something like that.

	jaap


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message