From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 13 15:03:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4966C106564A; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DD08FC0C; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MQMWG-0001bQ-Dj; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:28:40 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6DEUWPH041930; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:30:32 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n6DEUQ64041845; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:30:26 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:30:26 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-ID: <20090713143026.GA36954@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200907072353.n67NrlPh032677@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907072353.n67NrlPh032677@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/scons Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:03:14 -0000 On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:53:47PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > pgollucci 2009-07-07 23:53:47 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > devel/scons Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > Log: > - Update to checkpoint release 1.2.0_20090223 This change is wrong; PORTREVISION should not be used to encode any software version part; its sole purpose for ports infrastructure only. For complex vendor versions, DISTVERSION should be used instead. Right now, for instance, you've essentially made impossible to bump PORTREVISION, shall it be required for any reason, without introducing ugly hacks. Please address this when you next update the port. Thanks. ./danfe