Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:04:34 +1300 From: "Stefan Schablowski" <stefan.schablowski@prolificx.com> To: "Cy Schubert" <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, <ports-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, "Jim Davis" <jdavis@CS.Arizona.EDU> Subject: RE: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5 Makefile Message-ID: <048DAE2206FF0D45844991688ABAD648DEAFDD@Mercury.nz.prolificx.com> In-Reply-To: <200701150254.l0F2sh9S008241@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Do people prefer to have the documentation installed > by default with MIT KRB5 or would folks rather have > the documentation only installed when specified in > a make option? I'd opt for the latter option, having the doc only installed on demand. I would help a lot already, though, if the new knob was documented in a way that noobs like me understand, so I don't have to gaze at the Makefile diff scratching my head... CU Stefan=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Cy.Schubert@komquats.com [mailto:Cy.Schubert@komquats.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, 15 January 2007 3:55 p.m. > To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org; cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org;=20 > cvs-all@FreeBSD.org; freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Jim Davis;=20 > Stefan Schablowski > Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5 Makefile >=20 > In message <200701140513.l0E5DX9w038711@repoman.freebsd.org>,=20 > Cy Schubert write > s: > > cy 2007-01-14 05:13:32 UTC > >=20 > > FreeBSD ports repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > security/krb5 Makefile=20 > > Log: > > Include new documentation dependencies. > > =20 > > Conditionally build and install documentation using a new knob. > > =20 > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.109 +12 -2 ports/security/krb5/Makefile >=20 > I've received a couple of complaints so far from folks who=20 > aren't enamoured with the fact that texinfo or teTeX, and=20 > dvips are required to build the MIT KRB5 port. I've put a=20 > knob in the port to disable building and installing MIT's=20 > KRB5 documentation. Do people prefer to have the=20 > documentation installed by default with MIT KRB5 or would=20 > folks rather have the documentation only installed when=20 > specified in a make option? >=20 >=20 > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> > FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org >=20 > e**(i*pi)+1=3D0 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?048DAE2206FF0D45844991688ABAD648DEAFDD>