From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 18:08:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E90716A420; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:08:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from ant.bwct.de (ant.bwct.de [85.159.14.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C2643D68; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:08:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de ([10.1.1.7]) by ant.bwct.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBLI8St4000364; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:08:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [10.1.1.14]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBLI7uZS003879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:07:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBLI7ujq099953; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:07:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id jBLI7Zwh099952; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:07:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:07:35 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20051221180734.GB83393@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20051221020726.GV83393@cicely12.cicely.de> <200512211021.13384.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512211021.13384.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.4-STABLE alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Report: * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on cicely12.cicely.de Cc: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in tulip_txprobe X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:08:53 -0000 On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:21:12AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > This is more fallout from Ruslan's IF_LLADDR changes. The simplest fix would > be to change tulip_txprobe() to use sc->tulip_enaddr rather than IF_LLADDR > prior to the call to ether_ifattach(). Hmmm, tulip_addr_filter() can also be > called from tulip_init_locked() via tulip_linkup() via tulip_media_poll() as > well. *sigh* I hate to call ether_ifattach() before the chip is actually > known to be in a working state though which is the other alternative. You > can try this patch which uses sc->tulip_enaddr early on: It's booting with your patch. If you need a functional test let me know - so far the card is just in, because it's a combo card, network connection is done using an fxp card. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de