From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 14 16:40:46 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D516337B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE4B43FB1
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA14860;
	Sun, 15 Jun 2003 09:40:33 +1000
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 09:40:32 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Pete Carah <pete@ns.altadena.net>
In-Reply-To: <200306141904.h5EJ471f055956@ns.altadena.net>
Message-ID: <20030615092553.E22643@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <200306141904.h5EJ471f055956@ns.altadena.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pedantic again
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:40:47 -0000

On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Pete Carah wrote:

> Someone added "-std=gnu89 -pedantic" to libcrypto's make; given that
> stdlib.h and several other places contain "long long", this results in
> several thousands of warnings about C89.  We need to either go modern
> or not but not try both at once :-)

-std=c89 works fine for slightly wrong reasons, but not gnu89, mainly
because of spelling differences.  std=c89 prevents definition of
FreeBSD's __LONG_LONG_SUPPORTED in <sys/cdefs.h>, while std=gnu99
gives a definition of _LONGLONG by the compiler itself.  stdlib.h etc.
only understands the former.

> Also usr.bin/window generates LOTS of warnings; I didn't spot just what
> kind.

Someone added -std=mumble which causes lots of warnings in nonstandard code.

Bruce