From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 13 18:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1459D106567A for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C105B8FC17 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2010 13:42:10 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AOC74564; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:41:54 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2010 13:41:55 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19678.56292.374109.379533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:41:40 -0500 To: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20101113180936.00002e97@unknown> References: <20101112192954.GB18437@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101113021622.00001e07@unknown> <201011131159.23241.lobo@bsd.com.br> <4CDEA9D0.6000900@stillbilde.net> <20101113173748.GB23290@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101113130122.0e79ff45@scorpio> <20101113180936.00002e97@unknown> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: FreeBSD , freebsd.user@seibercom.net Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:42:12 -0000 Bruce Cran writes: > The NTDEV list has another way of dealing with these issues: a > thread can get locked if it strays off-topic or becomes otherwise > useless, preventing further follow-ups. That would require a level of active moderation I don't remember seeing here. Robert Huff