Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:35:07 -0500 From: dochawk@psu.edu To: YidukKwon@aol.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KLyX vs LyX Message-ID: <200112122135.fBCLZ7Z02082@fac13.ds.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:53:00 EST." <d8.104d66f4.2948046c@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yiduk yawned > 1. Is KLyx is older version of LyX? What are the differences between them? It > seems the KLyX has more GUI than the LyX. klyx spun off an *ancient* version of lyx, and was obsolete before it shipped. The only added feature, iirc, was that it could have multiple open windows, which (still) xforms- bound lyx can't > 2. Do both KLyX and LyX use LaTeX2e only or can TeTeX be used with the LyX or > KLyX? current tetex *is* 2e based. you can import latex into lyx; I believe relyx was still sketchy at the time of the fork. I also believe that klyx has not been maintained. It split 3 or 4 years ago . . . > 3. Is there any bug on the KLyX on dvi previewing? it should use the lyx export to latex, which is fed to kdvi. the bug would be elsewhere in kde, if any. lyx is currently moving to platform dependence, and qt will be a supported platform. hawk -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112122135.fBCLZ7Z02082>