From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 16 17:58:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A8A16A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C86A43D31 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:58:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B1816140DD; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:58:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:58:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040417003837.GB93908@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Mark Linimon cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_X_PREFIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:58:11 -0000 On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Some people still use it for that reason, so I don't think we should > actively break support when it doesn't cost much. Hmm. Well, it is probably as good a candidate as any for being labeled "not recommended for new applications" (which, btw, I note that no one has commented on ...) mcl