Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:21:29 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/gnutls Makefile Message-ID: <20050910052129.GA49500@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050910044627.GA761@lame.novel.ru> References: <200509091534.j89FY2Qi043829@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050909170934.GA42230@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910044627.GA761@lame.novel.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:46:27AM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Kris wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:34:02PM +0000, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > > novel 2005-09-09 15:34:02 UTC > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > >=20 > > > Modified files: > > > security/gnutls Makefile=20 > > > Log: > > > Don't CONFLICTS with gnutls-devel since it has been removed. > >=20 > > What if users still have it installed? >=20 > There were no ports which depended on gnutls-devel in ports tree. So I > don't think many users have it installed. And if they really have, I > suppose they should use security/gnutls instead. Though I can revive > CONFLICTS if you think it is needed. I'm pretty sure there were, previously. Kris --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDIm1ZWry0BWjoQKURAtYBAKCTkJ+Huxi3j5D9Av5xVHf+3CNF7gCgrtdB NKgkj/ba9ry1Jw2CazBnbKA= =bYWg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050910052129.GA49500>