Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:17:23 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> Cc: standards@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conundrum: _C99_SOURCE vs. sigset Message-ID: <200608031817.23847.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20060803213839.GH33267@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <200608031547.34386.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20060803213839.GH33267@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
четвер 03 серпень 2006 17:38, Stefan Farfeleder написав: > Try -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112. Thanks, I will. > The macro _C99_SOURCE is for pure C99 code and _ANSI_SOURCE for C90 > code. Both don't include the <pthread.h> header. They do -- it gets included from iostream, even when I define one of those. Thanks! -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200608031817.23847.mi%2Bmx>