From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 26 1:18:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A70154D2 for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 01:18:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from localhost (dfr@localhost) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA13510; Wed, 26 May 1999 09:18:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 09:18:02 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hacking objcopy In-Reply-To: <199905260307.LAA12331@ariadne.tensor.pgs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 26 May 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote: > > Would anyone have any objections to me hacking objcopy so that it could do the > following - > > a) Change symbol names from one thing to another > > b) Add/remove dependencies on other shared objects. > > If I submit these changes, what chance do I have of getting them made > "official"? If the changes are modular enough so that it won't make life difficult merging new versions of binutils, then I don't mind committing such a thing. If you can get the binutils maintainers to take the change, that would be the best possible situation. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message